Story Builder documentation

Accessibility statement

Last updated 2026-09-10

Exalink wants Story Builder to be usable by everyone who writes, and by everyone who reads. This page says where we stand, honestly.

What we aim for #

WCAG 2.1 level AA.

Where we stand #

Not yet formally audited. No external evaluation has been carried out, so we cannot claim conformance. What we can tell you is what has been deliberately built:

  • Every interactive control is reachable and operable from the keyboard, including the writing surface, the search palette and the dialogs.
  • Focus is always visible, and dialogs return focus where it came from.
  • Colour is never the only carrier of meaning; status is also a shape or a word.
  • Text colours are chosen against their backgrounds in both light and dark themes.
  • Animation is reduced or removed when your system asks for reduced motion.
  • The reader offers text size and reading-speed controls, and text-to-speech.
  • Interface text is available in English and Ukrainian.

Known gaps #

  • The map editor places markers on a canvas and, for the marker layer specifically, still expects a mouse. The same actions are reachable from the keyboard through the control panel's location list.
  • The relationship graph is drawn on a canvas and presents visual information that has no full text equivalent yet.
  • No audit has been done, so this list is what we know about, not necessarily all there is.

Telling us about a problem #

Write to the contact form with the page and what went wrong. We treat accessibility defects as defects — they go in the same queue as everything else that is broken, not a separate one that never gets read.

If you are not satisfied with our answer, you may contact the accessibility enforcement body in your country.

Next #

A formal audit against WCAG 2.1 AA, and this page rewritten to say what it found.